Cigarette factories suck in €1.5m of EU funding

December 2nd, 2010 | by | Published in Bureau Stories, Corporate Watch, EU structural Funds  |  6 Comments

Please support our work - share this article

2440781656_0b1160d405_b

More than €3m in public funds, an estimated €1.5m of which have come from the European Union’s structural funds, have been allocated to tobacco companies, helping to equip cigarette factories and fund training projects.

The EU spends more than €16m ($21m) a year on its anti-smoking campaign. It also excludes tobacco growers from the subsidy system under its common agricultural policy.

But our joint investigation with the Financial Times, found some of the world’s most profitable tobacco companies continue to receive EU funds under its flagship regional development programme.

In Bavaria, BAT has been granted an estimated €531,510 EU funds for the development of processing machinery. The funding was part of an overall grant signed off by the Bavarian state economy ministry totalling €1.6m.

According to data gathered from member countries, British American Tobaccoand Japan Tobacco International have received help from EU taxpayers for machinery and training programmes.

In Bavaria, the German region, BAT has been granted an estimated €531,510 EU funds for the development of processing machinery. The funding was part of an overall grant signed off by the Bavarian state economy ministry totalling €1.6m, with the remainder being supplied by the regional government.

BAT confirmed it had received the money and said the German project had run from 2007 to 2009 and focused entirely on applying an “extrusion” process it had developed at the factory. “The Bavarian government awarded us a grant due to the innovative nature of this technology,” BAT said.

JTI, which did not respond to requests for comment, was allocated an estimated €142,921 in EU funds in Poland for retraining staff, according to public data gathered as part of the investigation by the FT and the bureau.

International Tobacco Machinery, the Polish company, is the largest recipient of structural funds among the tobacco-related companies. It was allocated an estimated €888,770. The company confirmed it had received the grant and said it had been used for the “development of filter technology and filter machinery”.

Funding for machinery appears to be in breach of World Health Organisation guidelines within the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which recommends that “parties should not grant incentives, privileges or benefits to the tobacco industry to establish or run their businesses”.

According to the European Commission’s directorate-general for regional policy, there is nothing in EU law to prevent structural funds going to tobacco companies.

The WHO declined to comment on the funding.

The German health ministry said while the convention was legally binding the WHO guidelines were not. It said that from this year no other public funding would go to the tobacco industry.

According to the European Commission’s directorate-general for regional policy, there is nothing in EU law to prevent structural funds going to tobacco companies. Ton Van Lierop, spokesman for the directorate-general for regional policy, said: “It is not excluded that such companies could receive funding for certain activities. In certain circumstances, funding is possible – for example, the retraining of laid-off staff.”

The Commission’s health directorate says “as many as 650,000 Europeans die every year prematurely because of tobacco use”.

Related links:

Responses

  1. Mervi Hara says:

    December 3rd, 2010 at 11:12 am (#)

    Great article! Good work!

  2. Multinationals cash in on EU funds :: The Bureau of Investigative Journalism says:

    December 3rd, 2010 at 1:58 pm (#)

    [...] Cigarette factories suck in €1.5m of EU funding [...]

  3. Cigarette factories suck in €1.5m of EU funding | London Patriot says:

    December 8th, 2010 at 12:44 pm (#)

    [...] is an article published on The Bureau of Investigative Journalism newsletter that makes quite interesting reading. More than €3m in public funds, an estimated [...]

  4. Cigarette factories suck in €1.5m of EU funding | North East Patriot - The Nationwide Section says:

    December 8th, 2010 at 2:57 pm (#)

    [...] is an article published on The Bureau of Investigative Journalism newsletter that makes quite interesting reading. More than €3m in public funds, an estimated [...]

  5. Howard Huxter says:

    January 21st, 2011 at 3:24 pm (#)

    Good stuff. We need information like this.

  6. Melly says:

    February 17th, 2011 at 4:14 pm (#)

    If they are going to fund tobacco, it should be organically grown tobacco, without all the weird chemicals which are currently and unnecessarily added to tobacco.

    Canada has at least two organic tobacco companies, why isn’t it sold here?

Latest from the Bureau

White House briefings lay out new drone rulebook – but questions remain
May 24, 2013 | by | No Comments
White House (Michael Baird/ Flickr)

Signature strikes and CIA control of Pakistan drones likely until 2014, documents suggest

Home Secretary wins latest round of citizenship-stripping case
May 24, 2013 | by | No Comments
Must include shutterstock.com in caption

Vietnamese-born man accused of militant training loses Court of Appeal case.

Case study: Beleaguered in Brent
May 23, 2013 | by | No Comments
shutterstock_92189215-1

Hanane Toumi and her family work and study in Westminster but now commute from Brent.

Sharp rise in B&B spending as homelessness crisis intensifies
May 21, 2013 | by | No Comments
Copyright Hangtime/Shutterstock

A £90m bed and breakfast bill for UK's 12 largest cities.

Voices from the frontline of the housing crisis
May 20, 2013 | by | No Comments
shutterstock_89531086

Those who experience the housing maelstrom first-hand speak out.

Case study: Stranded in Southwark
May 20, 2013 | by | No Comments
Zara

With three children and a baby on the way Zara Mahamat just wants a stable home.

Infographic: Price of UK’s escalating housing crisis
May 20, 2013 | by | No Comments
Housing4

The scale of Britain's housing crisis visualised.

Get the data: Britain’s housing turmoil in numbers
May 19, 2013 | by | No Comments
shutterstock_5653459

Dataset: The Bureau's research into the extent and cost of housing upheaval.

How we did it: Tracking the housing crisis
May 19, 2013 | by | No Comments
House building via Shutterstock.com

Methodology: How the Bureau compiled its data on homelessness.

Britain’s housing crisis: The impact on children
shutterstock_105554129

A-star students fail to make the grade when they are moved away, say teachers.