Follow us on Facebook and Twitter Twitter Facebook

US company admits its technology has been used by Syrian government

November 1st, 2011 | by | Published in All Stories, Human Rights, State of Surveillance - The Data

On the internet - Mark Vancleave

A US company has acknowledged its equipment has been used by the Syrian government.

Last week the Bureau reported that members of ‘hacktivist’ group Telecomix had discovered technology from Blue Coat Systems, a California-based company was being used by the Syrian government. The activists claimed it was being used to block sites and monitor internet usage.

Blue Coat told the Bureau it had not sold equipment to Syria, which would have been a violation of a US export ban. The company said it was looking into the allegations.

Now the company has admitted its systems are being used in Syria, the Wall Street Journal has reported.

An internal investigation showed that 14 specific filtering devices traced by the activists were exported to Dubai via Rotterdam in late 2010 and then diverted to Syria. The Dubai-based distributor had indicated the devices were destined for Iraq’s Ministry of Communications, the company told the newspaper.

A Blue Coat executive said the company did not know how its technology got to Syria, and has alerted the US authorities.

Steve Daheb, a Blue Coat senior vice president, told the paper: ‘We don’t want our products to be used by the government of Syria or any other country embargoed by the United States.’

He added that the company was ‘saddened by the human suffering and loss of human life’ in Syria.

We don’t want our products to be used by the government of Syria or any other country embargoed by the United States 

Steve Daheb, Senior vice president, Blue Coat 

Analysis of the data by the Wall Street Journal showed that the Blue Coat equipment had either blocked or monitored at least ’26,700 attempts to connect to websites run by opposition figures or devoted to covering the Syrian uprising, such as all4syria.info and welati.net.’

Blue Coat does not monitor where remote software update requests come from and cannot turn off the devices remotely, the company told the Wall Street Journal.

Ross Anderson, professor of security engineering at Cambridge University, told the Bureau he was surprised by this statement.

‘Keeping up with all the world’s porn sites and with all the latest changes to Facebook and Skype is too big a job for authoritarian governments, except possibly China,’ he told the Bureau.

‘The only way the Saudis, Syrians, Iranians etc manage to cope is by getting continuous support from vendors in the West who devise and maintain these filters for the US corporate market in the first instance,’ he added.

Related links:

Comments are closed.

State of Surveillance

State of Surveillance
The Bureau's analysis of the global surveillance industry. Read the Spy Files here.

Support Privacy International

PI map
PI fights intrusions into private life by governments and corporations. Donate here.

Securing whom – and at what cost?

Face crowd
Susan Landau examines the risks. Read more here

Strengthen controls on tech companies

Face crowd
'Dont be evil' argues Mathias Vermuleun. Read more here

Big Data meets Big Brother

Big Brother
Ron Deibert examines cyber security. Read more here

Why privacy is essential

Megaphone
It's the only way for freedom to thrive, argues Jo Glanville. Read more here

State of Surveillance

Huge variation in police spying powers raises concerns
April 5, 2012 | by | 1 Comment
Image courtesy of Metropolitan Police, via Flickr Creative Commons

Some forces grant virtually all applications for phone records.

Analysis: The British government’s new plans for mass surveillance
April 2, 2012 | by | Comments Off
Image by ps_images via Flickr Creative Commons

The government's move for greater powers is nothing new, says Privacy International.