Follow us on Facebook and Twitter Twitter Facebook

Lord Bell questions money claims by Bell Pottinger executive

December 8th, 2011 | by | Published in All Stories, Lobbying's Hidden Influence

Flickr:englishpen

London, March 2011: Actors Jude Law and Kevin Spacey protest for freedom of speech in Belarus.

Lord Bell sought to answer questions about Bell Pottinger’s audit trail for the company’s work in Belarus, after one of his most senior executives cast doubt on who had been paying for its work in Europe’s last dictatorship.

The chairman of Bell Pottinger Public Relations, David Wilson, told Bureau undercover reporters who he thought were representing the repressive Uzbek government, that, in Belarus, ‘we were being funded by a – shall we say – a rich benefactor who had key interests in Belarus’.

Mr Wilson added: ‘In our work for Belarus, nobody knows who paid us but Belarus. As far as they were aware we were working on behalf of the government.’


All invoices were sent to the Belarus government and all payments were received from the Belarus government…. What David Wilson said was not true, I have no idea why he said it.
Lord Bell, Chime Communications

He was wrong
Lord Bell, the chairman of Bell Pottinger’s parent group, Chime Communications, told the Independent, which has published the Bureau’s investigation, that Mr Wilson, one of his closest colleagues, was wrong.

‘All invoices were sent to the Belarus government and all payments were received from the Belarus government,’ Lord Bell said.

‘What David Wilson said was not true, I have no idea why he said it.’

During the meeting, Mr Wilson had pointed out the need for an audit trail because Chime Communications is a listed company.


I do understand that. In our work for Belarus, nobody knows who paid us.
David Wilson, Bell Pottinger

He was asked by one undercover reporter, ‘Do you need to know who our backers are? If you don’t know, there’s deniability, isn’t there?’ Mr Wilson replied: ‘It would be useful… I’d have to check with my chairman. Because he would probably say we should know who we’re working for, because if the media asks us, ‘Who is your client?’ there has to be an audit trail because we are a quoted company. We have to be ethical.’

When asked, ‘Couldn’t you just say you’re working for [the front company] the Azimov Group? Do you need to know who is paying us?’ Mr Wilson added: ‘I do understand that. In our work for Belarus, nobody knows who paid us.’

Bell Pottinger ceased working for Belarus in 2009. Mr Wilson said, ‘Unfortunately our funding line stopped.’

Related links:

Comments are closed.

Secret World of Finance

The Financial Lobby
The Bureau analyses the lobbying power of the Financial Services industry.

Deaths in Police Custody

Deaths in Police Custody
A case to answer on the use of restraint.

Read the investigation here.

Covert War on Terror

Covert Drone War
The Bureau analyses the US's secret bombing campaign in Pakistan and Somalia.

Europe’s Hidden Billions

Iraq War Logs
The only comprehensive study of EU structural funds spending.

NHS Reforms Examined

NHS Reforms Examined
Examining the impact of the proposed overhaul of the NHS. Read more here

Newsletter Signup

To receieve our newsletter, sign up here

Related Articles

Bankers’ lobby steps up to save sky-high bonuses
May 14, 2012 | by | No Comments
Euro parliament- Flickr/John & Mel Kots

Industry group of bankers lobbies the EU on bankers' bonuses.

Chime profits fall in wake of Bureau sting
May 10, 2012 | by | No Comments
Lord Bell- The Independent

Lord Bell's PR company suffers a surprise slide in revenues.

Maldives’ new PR firm under fire
May 2, 2012 | by | 18 Comments
protest against detention of MPs by dying regime at Flickr

New regime hires PR firm to put positive gloss on Maldives' image.

PRWeek: The Bureau’s comments on the UK’s PR industry
April 24, 2012 | by | No Comments
bell-pottinger-lobbying-uk

The Bureau responds to Bell Pottinger's unethical conduct and the PR industry's regulatory body.

Standards Commissioner to rule on Cayman lobbyist
April 17, 2012 | by | No Comments
Towel tax haven - www.shutterstock.com

Commissioner will decide if peer broke Lords Code of Conduct.