Follow us on Facebook and Twitter Twitter Facebook

GMC moves to stop gagging clauses in NHS

January 26th, 2012 | by | Published in All Stories, Health

Flickr:Susan NYC

NHS doctors have been ‘paid off’ in the past to keep concerns to themselves.

The General Medical Council is to write to all UK doctors instructing them not to sign ‘gagging’ clauses, which would prevent them from raising concerns about poor practice and patient safety in their workplace.

New GMC guidance, which will come into force in March, aims to provide a more open culture, where medical professionals feel that they can air their concerns.

Sir Peter Rubin, chair of the GMC, told the Guardian: ‘Doctors have always had a duty to raise concerns, but what has changed is that we are saying this is so important now.’

The news comes following an investigation by the Bureau and Channel 4 News in August 2010, which revealed that NHS doctors were being gagged after they had blown the whistle.

Through Freedom of Information requests, the Bureau and Channel 4 discovered that over the past decade 170 doctors signed a settlement, or compromise agreement, with their trust. Of 64 heavily redacted contracts reviewed by the Bureau, 55 – nearly 90% – contained gagging clauses.

For instance, in the Peter Connelly – Baby P – case, a locum at St Ann’s Hospital in north London failed to spot injuries that led to his death. Prior to that, a paediatrician working there had raised concerns about the hospital. She was reportedly later offered £120,000 to leave and stay silent, which she refused. The hospital denied that the payoff was an attempt to gag her.

The Bureau and Channel 4 also unearthed cases where, rather than dealing with problems raised, whistleblowers had been victimised and their reputations tarnished, as NHS managers apparently attempted to divert attention from the issue.

The need for GMC guidance was intensified earlier this week, when the NHS watchdog with responsibility for protecting whistleblowers was itself revealed to have asked at least six employees to sign confidentiality agreements that would prevent them from criticising the organisation publicly.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) admitted to giving all six ‘special severance payments’. Yesterday, the Public Accounts Committee suggested that the CQC was ‘not fit for purpose’.

Related links:

Comments are closed.

Related articles

UN criticised in Sudan after children left unimmunised
May 20, 2012 | by | No Comments
IMG_7732web

Nuba mountains children left without immunological protection after UN pull out.

Analysis: Europe takes a step into the abyss
May 18, 2012 | by | No Comments
acroposhite

European peace and stability is no longer a given as economic crisis enters new dark phase.

Facebook: A bubble or a great investment?
May 18, 2012 | by | No Comments
shutterstock_59224768

What the papers say. A round-up of opinions on Facebook's valuation.

SEC begins investigation into US hedge fund Magnetar
May 18, 2012 | by | No Comments
WallStreetGreed1

Who’s been charged, has settled, or is now being investigated?

How Twitter mapped a ‘covert’ US drone operation in Yemen
Local paper Mukallastar.com reports on a drone-destroyed car

Social media tracks drone attacks in eastern Yemen.

Saudi ban on women’s sports blamed for rising obesity
May 18, 2012 | by | 1 Comment
Image AslanMedia

Saudi women are often banned from playing sports... with health consequences.