Amnesty International workers on strike for their own rights

October 17th, 2012 | by | Published in Bureau Stories, Human Rights  |  3 Comments

Please support our work - share this article

Candle- shutterstock/Roman Sigaev

 Snuffing out the candle: Amnesty’s workers fight for rights closer to home (Image: Shutterstock)

In a surprising move a group of staff from the human rights organisation Amnesty International went on strike today after senior management retracted their redundancy policy just hours before announcing changes that would result in dozens of staff losing their jobs.

In August staff at Amnesty’s International Secretariat were told that the campaigns and communications departments would be merged, leading to the loss of dozens of jobs. Two hours before announcing the merger management had informed workers’ union Unite that the organisation’s current redundancy policy would not apply to any staff who lost their jobs as a result of the restructure.

‘[Amnesty are] one of the most mendacious employers I have ever worked with… this is a struggle for the soul of Amnesty’- Unite’s Alan Scott

Dozens of staff from the global headquarters now face possible unemployment without an agreed redundancy policy.

Fighting for their rights
According to Amnesty International, a third of their 500+ staff members voted to strike. Unite predict the actual number of those on strike today was nearer to 300.

Picket lines formed around the international HQ in Clerkenwell, London and around 100 staff members gathered in a near-by church hall for a rally protest.

At the rally Alan Scott, from Unite described Amnesty’s management as ‘one of the most mendacious employers I have ever worked with,’ before describing the strike action as ‘a struggle for the soul of Amnesty.’

Messages of solidarity from Amnesty branches around the world were read out, as well as messages from other unions worldwide. The Beirut office announced they are striking in solidarity while a message from the Netherlands office recognised the ‘hard decision’ to strike given the disruption the strike will cause to staff’s human rights campaigning.

Alan Scott (Unite) addresses Amnesty staff.

 

In a previous statement Alan Scott said: ‘Amnesty International cannot be an effective or credible human rights organisation if it does not respect the rights of its workers. The organisation’s senior management must adhere to the same standards it demands of governments and corporations globally.’

Restructure
Amnesty released an official statement in response to the strike saying, ‘We very much regret that staff have taken the decision to take industrial action, while fully respecting their right to do so.’ They went on to explain the reshuffle comes as part of structural changes to the NGO which will move work from the London HQ to ‘ten regional hubs around the world, located closer to where human rights violations occur, particularly in the Global South and East.’

‘We very much regret that staff have taken the decision to take industrial action, while fully respecting their right to do so.’

A spokesperson from Unite explained that it is not the proposed changes that those on strike object to but ‘the way in which it is being done.’

This is not the first time the NGO faced criticism for its management decisions. The organisation previously came under fire in 2011 when it was revealed that a secret pay-off to former directors had cost the charity £800,000. The payments were supposedly made to former secretary general Irene Khan, who reportedly received £500,000,  and her deputy Kate Gilmore.

Speaking to press at the time Peter Pack, chairman of Amnesty’s international executive committee, said: ‘The payments to outgoing secretary general Irene Khan shown in the accounts of AI (Amnesty International) Ltd for the year ending March 31 2010 include payments made as part of a confidential agreement between AI Ltd and Irene Khan. It is a term of this agreement that no further comment on it will be made by either party.’

Related links:

Responses

  1. Paul Codd says:

    October 17th, 2012 at 8:59 pm (#)

    Amnesty is an organisation very close to my heart. I have worked as a volunteer and have helped raise thousands of pounds at parties held in Amnesty’s name. If this is a battle for the soul of Amnesty (as I believe it may be), it should be remembered that the organisation was born in a different age and from a different generation. I wonder how long it will take for a P2P version to appear. As soon as a credible alternative appears that adheres to modern standards of transparency, openness and participation it will have no problems attracting eager members and volunteers such as myself. I believe the battle for Amnesty’s soul isn’t lost and remain at the organisation’s disposition, but the fact is my efforts have to be prioritised somewhere, and given the choice of closed, secretive and non-participative, with a modern P2P alternative, well, truthfully there is no choice.

  2. Seunghwan Kim(South Korea) says:

    October 18th, 2012 at 7:21 am (#)

    I really hope this happening is going to show for what International Amnesty do. i bet this event is going to decide the way of International Amnesty. we have to protect of rights of workers.

  3. Andreas Moser says:

    October 18th, 2012 at 2:25 pm (#)

    Amnesty International on strike? You don’t say. I hope they will return to work immediately, so that the killing in Syria, the labour camps in North Korea and the mistreatment of women in Saudi Arabia will stop immediately. – Or won’t it make any difference: http://andreasmoser.wordpress.com/2012/10/18/amnesty-international-strike/ ?

Latest from the Bureau

Obama frames covert drone war as necessary evil
May 23, 2013 | by | No Comments
Obama de Souza April 2013

Obama admits civilians have been killed in drone strikes.

Case study: Beleaguered in Brent
May 23, 2013 | by | No Comments
shutterstock_92189215-1

Hanane Toumi and her family work and study in Westminster but now commute from Brent.

Sharp rise in B&B spending as homelessness crisis intensifies
May 21, 2013 | by | No Comments
Copyright Hangtime/Shutterstock

A £90m bed and breakfast bill for UK's 12 largest cities.

Voices from the frontline of the housing crisis
May 20, 2013 | by | No Comments
shutterstock_89531086

Those who experience the housing maelstrom first-hand speak out.

Case study: Stranded in Southwark
May 20, 2013 | by | No Comments
Zara

With three children and a baby on the way Zara Mahamat just wants a stable home.

Infographic: Price of UK’s escalating housing crisis
May 20, 2013 | by | No Comments
Housing4

The scale of Britain's housing crisis visualised.

Get the data: Britain’s housing turmoil in numbers
May 19, 2013 | by | No Comments
shutterstock_5653459

Dataset: The Bureau's research into the extent and cost of housing upheaval.

How we did it: Tracking the housing crisis
May 19, 2013 | by | No Comments
House building via Shutterstock.com

Methodology: How the Bureau compiled its data on homelessness.

Britain’s housing crisis: The impact on children
shutterstock_105554129

A-star students fail to make the grade when they are moved away, say teachers.

Forced exodus: London’s homeless pushed to suburbs
shutterstock_2059466

Benefit claimants should not be able to live in areas others can't afford, says housing minister.