Drone Warfare

More than 2,400 dead as Obama’s drone campaign marks five years

comments
Obama de Souza April 2013

Obama has launched over 390 covert drone strikes in his first five years in office (Pete Souza/White House).

Five years ago, on January 23 2009, a CIA drone flattened a house in Pakistan’s tribal regions. It was the third day of Barack Obama’s presidency, and this was the new commander-in-chief’s first covert drone strike.

Initial reports said up to ten militants were killed, including foreign fighters and possibly a ‘high-value target’ – a successful first hit for the fledgling administration.

But reports of civilian casualties began to emerge. As later reports revealed, the strike was far from a success. At least nine civilians died, most of them from one family. There was one survivor, 14-year-old Fahim Qureshi, but with horrific injuries including shrapnel wounds in his stomach, a fractured skull and a lost eye, he was as much a victim as his dead relatives.

Ob1 - Fahim Qureshi - Vocativ GrabLater that day, the CIA attacked again – and levelled another house. It proved another mistake, this time one that killed between five and ten people, all civilians.

Obama was briefed on the civilian casualties almost immediately and was ‘understandably disturbed’, Newsweek reporter Daniel Klaidman later wrote. Three days earlier, in his inauguration address, Obama had told the world ‘that America is a friend of each nation, and every man, woman and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity.’

Fahim Qureshi, injured in the first Obama strike
(Vocativ/YouTube).

The Pakistani government also knew civilians had been killed in the strikes. A record of the strikes made by the local political administration and published by the Bureau last year listed nine civilians among the dead. But the government said nothing about this loss of life.

Yet despite this disastrous start the Obama administration markedly stepped up the use of drones. Since Obama’s inauguration in 2009, the CIA has launched 330 strikes on Pakistan – his predecessor, President George Bush, conducted 51 strikes in four years. And in Yemen, Obama has opened a new front in the secret drone war.

For all the Bureau’s drones data: Get the data – drone wars

Lethal strikes
Across Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, the Obama administration has launched more than 390 drone strikes in the five years since the first attack that injured Qureshi – eight times as many as were launched in the entire Bush presidency. These strikes have killed more than 2,400 people, at least 273 of them reportedly civilians.

Although drone strikes under Obama’s presidency have killed nearly six times as many people as were killed under Bush, the casualty rate – the number of people killed on average in each strike – has dropped from eight to six under Obama. The civilian casualty rate has fallen too. Strikes during the Bush years killed nearly more than three civilians in each strike on average. This has halved under Obama (1.43 civilians per strike on average). In fact reported civilian casualties in Pakistan have fallen sharply since 2010, with no confirmed reports of civilian casualties in 2013.

The decline in civilian casualties could be because of reported improvements in drone and missile technology, rising tensions between Pakistan and the US over the drone campaign, and greater scrutiny of the covert drone campaign both at home and abroad.

Presidents Pakistan
Obama has sharply escalated the drone campaign in Pakistan.

The apparent change in targeting  is well demonstrated by comparing a strike carried out by the Bush administration in 2006 and one seven years later under Obama. On October 30 2006 at least 68 children were killed when CIA drones destroyed a madrassa – a religious school – in the Bajaur area of Pakistan’s tribal belt. The attack was reportedly targeting then-al Qaeda second-in-command Ayman al Zawahiri. He escaped. On November 21 last year, drones again targeted a madrassa, this time in Hangu, outside the tribal regions. As many as 80 students were sleeping in the building. But the strike destroyed a specific portion of the building – just one or two rooms – and killed between six and nine people.

In Yemen, however, civilians continue to die in US drone strikes. Last year saw the highest civilian casualty rate since Obama first hit the country in 2009.

In recent years drones have come to dominate Obama’s war in Yemen as much as in Pakistan.

Drones were not the first weapon the administration turned to when it started to attack the country. On December 17 2009 a US Navy submarine launched a cluster bomb-laden cruise missile at a suspected militant camp in al Majala, southern Yemen.

The missile slammed into a hamlet hitting one of the poorest tribes in Yemen. Shrapnel and fire left at least 41 civilians dead, including at least 21 children and 12 women – five of them were pregnant. A week earlier President Obama had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. He used his acceptance speech to defend the use of force at times as ‘not only necessary but morally justified’. He warned that ‘negotiations cannot convince al Qaeda’s leaders to lay down their arms’.

Strikes in Pakistan are carried out by the CIA. But in Yemen the CIA and the US military’s special forces unit, Joint Special Operations Command, have used various weapons including drones and conventional jets as well as cruise missiles to target al Qaeda militants.

However in recent years drones have come to dominate Obama’s war in Yemen as much as in Pakistan. President Bush ordered a single drone strike in Yemen, killing six people in 2002. Under Obama, the CIA and the Pentagon have launched at least 58 drone strikes on the country killing more than 281 people, including at least 24 reported civilians.

Opaque operations
The escalation in the drone war has happened with almost no official transparency from the White House. It took Obama three years to publicly mention his use of drones. In January 2012 he said ‘actually drones have not caused a huge number of civilian casualties’. He added: ‘For the most part they have been very precise, precision strikes against al Qaeda and affiliates.’

In this period Bureau records show drones reportedly killed at least 236 civilians – including 61 children. And according to a leaked CIA record of drone strikes, seen by the McClatchy news agency, the US often did not know who it was killing. In the year after September 2010 at least 265 of up to 482 people were recorded as the documents as killed by drones ‘were “assessed” as Afghan, Pakistani and unknown extremists’.

A letter written by Attorney General Eric Holder and leaked to NBC confirmed drones had killed four US citizens living abroad. US citizen Anwar al Awlaki died in a missile strike in Yemen on September 30 2011. His 16-year-old son Abdulrahman, who was born in Detroit, was killed in a separate strike two weeks later.

In April 2013 a leaked Department of Justice memo outlined the administration’s legal justification for such killings: the US has the right to kill US citizens if they pose an imminent threat, it said. It added that determining a citizen poses an imminent threat ‘does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on US persons and interests will take place in the immediate future’. Jameel Jaffer of the American Civil Liberties Union described the memo as a ‘chilling document’.

For the most part they have been very precise, precision strikes against al Qaeda and affiliates
- President Obama

The following month President Obama made a major policy speech in which he codified the rules his administration must follow as it selects targets for drone strikes and special forces teams.

The rules are meant to constrain the use of drones. Obama said the US only carries out such attacks against individuals who pose ‘a continuing and imminent threat’ to US citizens, not ‘to punish individuals’. Obama acknowledged drone strikes had killed civilians, saying: ‘For me, and those in my chain of command, those deaths will haunt us as long as we live.’ And he added: ‘Before any strike is taken, there must be near-certainty that no civilians will be killed or injured – the highest standard we can set’.

However Bureau analysis shows more people were killed in Pakistan and Yemen in the six months after the speech than the six months before. And the casualty rate also rose over the same period.

In 2013, there were no confirmed civilian casualties in Pakistan – the first year of the drone campaign that this was the case. But in Yemen, the year ended with mass civilian casualties. On December 12, JSOC drones attacked a convoy taking a bride to her wedding. The attack destroyed several vehicles and flying shrapnel killed up to 15 civilians. It was the biggest single loss of civilian life from a US strike for more than a year. The Yemeni government initially claimed al Qaeda militants were killed. But the Yemeni government quickly negotiated reparations with the families of the victims, sending them $140,000 and 100 rifles. The US has not commented on the strike, but in an unprecedented move Washington is carrying out an investigation.

Subscribe to the drones newsletter. Follow @jackserle on Twitter.

Responses to this story

  • HP Beall says:

    March 16, 2014 at 11:55 pm

    Response to the January 26, 2014 at 12:57 pm comment.
    Media in the US has been feeding US citizens with false information leaked by high up government officials. We were unaware of the actual civilian death toll, including women and children. And those that are willing to tell america the truth such as Gov. Jessie Ventura, are banned from live broadcast by the FCC. Being unaware of the truth does not make us “Cowardly Americans”. And calling us “Cowardly Americans” is not going to encourage any of us to look for the truth beyond our borders. What I would suggest as an informative tool is to share as many petitions and and YouTube videos on social networks like twitter and Facebook. This is how I was informed of the truth. This is how others will be informed. But continuing to allow them to be unaware will not bring about the change you are looking for.

  • HP Beall says:

    March 16, 2014 at 10:47 pm

    16-year-old Abdulrahman al-Awlaki was born in Denver, Co. not Detroit.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/documents/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-birth-certificate.html

  • max says:

    March 6, 2014 at 6:03 pm

    I’m sorry but who started the war in Iraq? oh right that was Bush. While I don’t agree with what Obama has done, and how is he supposed to get ANYTHING done if congress wont help him. IF YOU want to blame someone blame congress and how lazy it has become. They are the real problem.

  • Alice says:

    January 29, 2014 at 11:07 am

    The US and UK are the world’s biggest terrorists. Anyone else is an insurgent and deserves to die. When was it that the US declared war on the Yemen? Imagine the horror and outrage if these attacks happened on US or UK soil … It is deeply depressing. Obama has shown himself to be a weak president unable to control the US military

  • Fluck says:

    January 26, 2014 at 12:57 pm

    There has been no drop in civilian casualties. Cowardly Americans have simply let Obama redefine his victims as militants. Anyone that dies to America’s drone slaughter is considered a “militant” who is an imminent threat to the US.

    Americans are cowards, allowing the slaughter of innocent people thousands and thousands of miles from their country so they feel “safe”… but not a single one has the guts to use the 2nd Amendment to fight the oppressive rulers giving American tax money to billionaires fraudsters.

  • JB says:

    January 26, 2014 at 9:16 am

    So that’s a maximum of 48 terrorists and 2,352 Innocents. Huh, that’s about the same odds that happened on that faithful day of Sept 11.

  • Debrah says:

    January 25, 2014 at 2:04 pm

    And how did all you supporters of drone strikes feel when those two planes killed 3000 of your citizens, your family, your friends? Considering how many civilians America has murdered, does that give you pause at all? Or do you not care because they live somewhere else?

  • Decided says:

    January 25, 2014 at 11:37 am

    Now, I wonder if you compared the amount of civilians killed in friendly fire by manned US operations in the same areas, would the graphs be the opposite?

  • Jack says:

    January 25, 2014 at 5:26 am

    Every, and I mean EVERY state is built upon a foundation of dead bodies.

    Our foundation is built upon violent psychopaths, while opposition states are based upon dead non-combatants. Keep that in perspective.

  • traveler says:

    January 24, 2014 at 10:01 pm

    Unwillingly,amy be,and I’m not even sure of that fact, but presidebnt Obama has become a mass-murderers and an oger for children.

  • Bick says:

    January 24, 2014 at 9:05 pm

    People that actually support these strikes are completely missing the point. I even read below where someone justified civilian deaths by citing how many civilians Al Qaida has killed. Just because a group kills civilians does not justify such a horrible deed. It is insane to think it would. Part of the reason we are fighting Al Qaida in the first place is because they kill civilians. To practice the same makes us no different other than we have bigger and better weapons.

    The Obama administration is trigger happy and doesn’t care how many innocent people get in the way. This issue needs to be addressed and the administration needs to be brought under control. Imagine how many more new Al Qaida recruits were created the day they killed 41 civilians including 5 pregnant women? This drone campaign is doing more harm than good for our foreign policy and our image around the globe, that is for certain.

  • Jacob says:

    January 24, 2014 at 7:35 pm

    “Compare this to airstrikes/troops/cruise missles”

    How about we compare it to negotiation, or better yet, peace?

  • Rob says:

    January 24, 2014 at 8:55 am

    Obama is haunted for as long as he lives. Yeah, he looks pretty haunted on the golf course. For some reason, Obama saying he is haunted hasn’t kept the world from overwhelmingly picking the USA as the greatest threat to world peace at the end of 2013.

    Here are some of the reasons for that, and a look at some US victims and the “leaders” eternally haunted by them. Warning: there are graphic images at end of article: http://www.empireslayer.blogspot.com

  • Jerold Kappel says:

    January 23, 2014 at 10:33 pm

    And how many civilians have the Taliban, Al Qaeda and its related groups, and other extremists killed in the past ten years. How many military personnel have we lost protecting those civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq. Perspective is needed.

  • Mark says:

    January 23, 2014 at 8:37 pm

    There is implicit criticism in this article of the drone strategy, yet I did not see any estimate of what casualties might have been like had airstrikes or cruise missiles been used instead of drones. Drones produce far less unintended casualties than any other option.

  • carolyn miller says:

    January 23, 2014 at 8:20 pm

    Maybe we should have sent in a battalion of troops, some ships, and aerial bombing? And of course, pay for all of that?

  • Patrick says:

    January 23, 2014 at 6:09 pm

    compare that to Iraq.